Stewards/Elections 2020/Votes/Lionel Scheepmans: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Browse history interactively
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Alch Bot (talk | contribs)
Bots
28,785 edits
m Bot: checking votes in Stewards Elections 2020
Line 58: Line 58:
# {{Se-vote|2020|Cyfraw|checked=e|cb=CptViraj}} [[User:cyfraw|<b style="color:#00B">cyrfaw</b>]] ([[User talk:Cyfraw|<small style="color: green;">talk</small>]]) 13:28, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
# {{Se-vote|2020|Cyfraw|checked=e|cb=CptViraj}} [[User:cyfraw|<b style="color:#00B">cyrfaw</b>]] ([[User talk:Cyfraw|<small style="color: green;">talk</small>]]) 13:28, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
# {{Se-vote|2020|Vmavanti|checked=e|cb=Ankry}} [[User:Vmavanti|Vmavanti]] ([[User talk:Vmavanti|talk]]) 17:13, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
# {{Se-vote|2020|Vmavanti|checked=e|cb=Ankry}} [[User:Vmavanti|Vmavanti]] ([[User talk:Vmavanti|talk]]) 17:13, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
# --[[User:AFBorchert|AFBorchert]] ([[User talk:AFBorchert|talk]]) 18:59, 10 February 2020 (UTC) Thanks for the offer but I miss the necessary experience with currently less than 20,000 overall contributions. In addition, stewards should be familiar with common English technical terms of Wikimedia projects but this is [https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2020/Questions&diff=prev&oldid=19730013 apparently not the case].


==== {{sr-heading|neutral}} ====
==== {{sr-heading|neutral}} ====

Revision as of 18:59, 10 February 2020

Warning

The 2020 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Lionel Scheepmans

ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: fr-N, pt-3, en-3, es-2, it-1, de-1, nl-1, bm-1, ta-1, vi-1.
  • Personal info: (English)
    Dear wikimedian people,

    My real name is my user name : Lionel Scheepmans. I am a French native speaker Belgian guy borns in 1969. I can easely communicate in English and Portuguese and I also have some basic capacities in Spanish, German, Dutch and also Malinké, Tamil and Vietnamese language. Finally, I'm also a good user of Deepl for European languages and Google translate for other one .

    All my background is displayed on my Meta-Wiki user page and all my curriculum and academic works on my French Wikiversity user page. My complete CV is also available on this page. In summary, I am very active on Wikimédia Movement on line since 2011 and off line since 2014. I am one of the founding member of Wikimedia Belgium chapter, and I'm actually in the board since two years with cumulative function of administrator in our wiki-site. I've started to be administrator in fr.wikiversity in 2015 and more recently, I've took back the interface administration. All statistical information about my online activities can be check on the Wikiscan tool.

    Actually PhD student in anthropology making my thesis about Wikimedia movement, I feel very confident about what I can bring to the Wikimedia movement as a steward. If I'm selected, my knowledge of minority cultures and my experience of living in the "Global South" (Africa, India, South America) will certainly help me in my interventions on Wiki projects created in minority languages than we all want, I think, see developing.

    A nice end of the day to all! Lionel
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2020/Questions#Lionel_Scheepmans


Yes

  2. Eggishorn (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020 •  Eggishorn (talk) 19:41, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
       MarieVirtuElle (Not eligible, checked by NahidSultan) •  MarieVirtuElle (talk) 19:47, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Krzysiek 123456789 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020 •  Krzysiek 123456789 (talk) 20:28, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Gotanda (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2020 •  Gotanda (talk) 00:23, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Sg7438 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Sg7438 (talk) 09:34, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Gereon K. (talk) 16:41, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Ruthven (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Ruthven (msg) 17:07, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Dostojewskij (talk) 21:35, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  9. LH7605 (Eligible, checked by Vermont)2020 •  LH7605 (talk) 01:13, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Gharouni (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Gharouni 03:36, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  11. SickManWP (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  I think he can be do this very need job--SickManWP (talk) 05:29, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Authueil (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Authueil (talk) 06:45, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Veracious (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Veracious (talk) 14:28, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No

  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020 •  Oppose. Reading through the questions I just get the sense they think being a steward is being on a global Arbitration Committee or Governing Committee, which it is not. I mean, I get that not all stewards are countervandalism fighters, but then I would expect some more involvement in things like Meta RFCs or on policy discussions on Meta (or even serving as a bureaucrat) - and I don't see that. I just don't think this is a good fit overall - maybe something like the Language committee would be better. Rschen7754 14:04, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  2. 5LZ (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Excuse my offense, but stewards are no Wikimedia politicians, and we are not electing a congressman. 5LZ 14:09, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  3. -revi (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020 •  User:-revi/SEV; fails 1, 2, 3 — regards, Revi 14:11, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  4. CptViraj (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  CptViraj (📧) 14:11, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  5. TonyBallioni (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  TonyBallioni (talk) 14:14, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  6. 1997kB (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  From answers to questions it does looks like they don't know what this role is about. Plus lack of crosswiki experience. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 14:16, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  I think stewards should have a longer tenure in administration functions first, while you have been active in fr wikiversity, I'd prefer to see tenure in larger projects first. — xaosflux Talk 14:17, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Minorax (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Minorax (talk) 14:25, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Camouflaged Mirage (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Poor answers to questions, I expect slightly more. Regretful, I know you are in good faith. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:33, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Turkmen (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 • --Turkmen talk 14:55, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  11. KPFC (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  KPFC 💬 14:59, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Praxidicae (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Not going to pile on with a lengthy oppose but I agree with Rschen. Praxidicae (talk) 15:02, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Stwalkerster (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  stwalkerster (talk) 16:08, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Minorax)2020 •  Inadequate experience Herby talk thyme 16:20, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Esteban16 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Misunderstanding of the steward role. Esteban16 (talk) 17:28, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Not suitable. Trijnsteltalk 17:54, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  The answers to the questions doesn't convince me. Also, cross-wiki experience for me is little. --Stïnger （会話） 18:14, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  18. RhinosF1 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Per others RhinosF1 (talk) 18:58, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Ankry (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Ankry (talk) 19:13, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  20. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  *Youngjin (talk) 20:38, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Sintakso (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Unconvincing statement and answers Sintakso (talk) 22:07, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Klaas van Buiten (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  per Rschen7754 Klaas `Z4␟` V:  00:48, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Not seeing enough cross-wiki experience to support a candidate like this. Hiàn (talk) 02:39, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Vermont (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  as per Rschen7754 Vermont (talk) 03:06, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:31, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Hégésippe Cormier (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Hégésippe | ±Θ± 09:06, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Grasyop (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Défaut de confiance. Lack of confidence. Grasyop ✉ 09:15, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Jules78120 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  User of good will, but I'm not convinced at all by answers to questions. — Jules Talk 10:46, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Thibaut120094 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Like Jules78120 said, user of good will, but not enough cross-wiki and technical experience. Thibaut (talk) 11:35, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  30. 1ForTheMoney (Eligible, checked by Pallerti)2020 •  Mostly per Rschen's reasons, but I hope Lionel will try again next year 1ForTheMoney (talk) 12:51, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Daniuu (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020 •  Per reasons given above. Daniuu (talk) 14:38, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  32. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020 •  MZaplotnik(talk) 15:24, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  33. ST47 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Does not appear to be qualified for the role. ST47 (talk) 17:41, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Linedwell (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Linedwell [talk] 19:33, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Hadrianus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Hadrianus (talk) 19:51, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Streetdeck (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  --Wright Streetdeck 04:49, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Jo-Jo Eumerus (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020 •  Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:59, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  cyrfaw (talk) 13:28, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Vmavanti (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Vmavanti (talk) 17:13, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  40. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:59, 10 February 2020 (UTC) Thanks for the offer but I miss the necessary experience with currently less than 20,000 overall contributions. In addition, stewards should be familiar with common English technical terms of Wikimedia projects but this is apparently not the case.[reply]

Neutral

  2. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Richardkiwi (talk) 14:50, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  I agree with Rschen7754 and Camouflaged Mirage. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:13, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  --Mirer (talk) 19:16, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020 •  ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 04:36, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Fanchb29 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  -- Fanchb29 (talk) 13:54, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Daniel J Zhao (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Daniel J Zhao (talk) 14:37, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020 •  Miniapolis 16:26, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Cbyd (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  De bonne volonté mais j'ai l'impression étrange qu'il se trompe d'élection. Cbyd (talk) 21:41, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Fenikals (Verification pending) •  Fenikals (talk) 18:15, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2020/Votes/Lionel_Scheepmans&oldid=19795844"