+++ to secure your transactions use the Bitcoin Mixer Service +++
Freenet 0.7 build 1053 is now available. Please upgrade! This build will be
mandatory soon. Changes include fixes to temporary file leaks, thread pooling
(which should solve the high system load bug), containers fixes, client layer
fixes and security fixes. Please upgrade!
pgp5JOk3WAN99.pgp
Centralised is bad, spammable is bad. But in any case we don't have the
technology to route requests to an anonymous central server over the network;
that's one-to-one streams, maybe in 0.8.
On Friday 10 August 2007 22:32, Michael Tänzer wrote:
As I'm just a translator, I'm not really familiar
On Friday 10 August 2007 22:58, Jerome Flesch wrote:
PROPOSED SOLUTION:
0. ULPRs. (Node)
Ultra-Lightweight Persistent Requests are the basis of all that follows.
Essentially this is a means to limit the load caused by polling clients
such as Frost, to get messages to the clients faster,
On Friday 10 August 2007 21:23, Edgar Friendly wrote:
Jerome Flesch wrote:
With a WoT, if you accept to read the new-comers, you accept to read the
spam. So in the end, you risk to end with no-one reading anymore the
posts from the newbies.
Might it work to distribute the load of looking
Freenet 0.7 build 1054 is now available. This fixes some bugs in 1053 relating
to thread pooling, in particular it won't reject requests due to shortage of
threads unless the number of threads actually doing useful work is over the
limit.
On Saturday 11 August 2007 19:17, Matthew Toseland
Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Friday 10 August 2007 21:23, Edgar Friendly wrote:
Jerome Flesch wrote:
With a WoT, if you accept to read the new-comers, you accept to read the
spam. So in the end, you risk to end with no-one reading anymore the
posts from the newbies.
Might it work to distribute
> PROPOSED SOLUTION:
> 0. ULPRs. (Node)
> Ultra-Lightweight Persistent Requests are the basis of all that follows.
> Essentially this is a means to limit the load caused by polling clients
> such as Frost, to get messages to the clients faster, and to make messages
> which have been lost by being
scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070811/8819dd3a/attachment.pgp>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As I'm just a translator, I'm not really familiar with how exactly
Freenet works, but I had some ideas on this topic so here they are:
I think a kind of public rating system could help, which stores the
username of the poster, and how many people
part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070811/cae90c4f/attachment.pgp>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070811/d9efe1ea/attachment.pgp>
ked by a heuristic "this identity only made one post"). Unless identities
are costly (and I have shown above one way for them to be), blacklists are of
no use: There is no such thing as negative trust in cyberspace.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070811/dfc76a51/attachment.pgp>
well whitelist people, and
> then we arrive back at the web of trust solution.
>
> E.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070811/4dff24f8/attachment.pgp>
ease upgrade!
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070811/05c1688a/attachment.pgp>
Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Friday 10 August 2007 21:23, Edgar Friendly wrote:
>> Jerome Flesch wrote:
>>> With a WoT, if you accept to read the new-comers, you accept to read the
>>> spam. So in the end, you risk to end with no-one reading anymore the
>>> posts from the newbies.
>> Might it work
Here is the french translation update.
-- next part --
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: freenet.l10n.fr.override.properties
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070811/720c90cf/attachment.ksh>
-
16 matches
Mail list logo
